WEKO3
アイテム
An EIL Awareness Questionnaire: Development and Validity in a Japanese Context
https://doi.org/10.34388/1157.00001291
https://doi.org/10.34388/1157.000012914c221145-aa94-4b00-9c95-8abafe3081e9
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
文学部57-3 (319.6 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2015-05-02 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | An EIL Awareness Questionnaire: Development and Validity in a Japanese Context | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | An EIL Awareness Questionnaire: Development and Validity in a Japanese Context | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | EIL | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | feasibility | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | questionnaire | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | EIL | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | feasibility | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | questionnaire | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34388/1157.00001291 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
中山, 誠一
× 中山, 誠一 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 2911 | |||||
| 姓名 | Nakayama, Tomokazu | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This study describes the construction of an EIL feasibility questionnaire that can be used in a Japanese context applying the theoretical rameworks of Jenkins (2005) and Golombek and Jordan (2005). Following the psychometric procedure for questionnaire development established by Vandergrift, Goh, Mareschal, and Tafaghodtari (2006), a questionnaire was created, its validity confirmed, and exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses conducted. Eleven items were removed from the first 55-item version of the questionnaire. A 44-item version was administered to 203 Japanese university students and the results underwent exploratory factor analysis. The results yielded a nine-item questionnaire with a three-factor model. The first factor comprised four items and was named Native Speaker Myths. The second factor included three items and was named Identity. The third factor, EIL Awareness, consisted of two items. This tentative three-factor uestionnaire model was sent to another group of 144 Japanese university students. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the questionnaire’s three-factor model was significantly valid and reliable. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
実践女子大学文学部紀要 en : The Faculty of Letters of Jissen Women's University annual reports of studies 巻 57, p. 11-19, 発行日 2015-03-12 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 実践女子大学 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02868466 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00105367 | |||||
